Construction Process with 2 shoring Sets

This example shows how to schedule the construction process of a 9-story conceptual structure considering the works: columns, slabs, and concrete hardening with four different scheduling methods:

  • Detailed schedule: Considering three activities: columns, slabs, and concrete hardening, with only Finish-to-Start relationships.

  • Semi-detailed schedule: Considering two activities, the first joining the activities of columns and slabs into one activity, and the second for the concrete hardening. This solution requires Finish-to-Start and Finish-to-Finish relationships.

  • Compact schedule: Considering only one activity joining the activities of columns, slabs, and modeling the concrete hardening as a Finish-to-Finish relationship. This solution is modeled with Finish-to-Start and Finish-to-Finish relationships.

  • Schedule with sub-activities: Considering just one activity for columns and slabs, and another one for the concrete hardening period.

The durations and calendars considered for the activities are:

  • Columns: 9 days Project calendar (work calendar)

  • Slabs: 3 days Project calendar (work calendar)

  • Concrete hardening: The estimated durations for achieving the required maturity of the slabs and their subsequent unshoring are:

    • Slab 1: 8 days

    • Slab 2 to 8: 7 days

    • Slab 9: 2 days

    The calendar is the "Natural calendar", with all days initially designated as working days.

With only two sets of shores available, it's necessary to establish a relationship between the required maturity for unshoring each slab (I), and the shoring of the slab (i+2). For projects with three sets of slabs, this relationship would extend to the shoring of the third subsequent slab (i+3).

The time required for the construction process is the same regardless of the scheduling method used, and the specific details are provided in the following paragraphs:

  • Detailed schedule: This case, despite being the simplest, necessitates the highest number of activities (27) and relationships (33) (Figure 2).

  • Semi-detailed schedule: In this scheduling mode, activities columns and slabs are joined for each level into one activity, requiring 18 activities and 26 relationships.

    The Finish-to-Finish relationship from required maturity (i) to (i+2) is established in 3 work days, corresponding to the duration of the slab (Figure 3 Up).

  • Compact schedule: This scheduling mode agrupate all the activities corresponding to a level into just one activity, requiring 9 activities and 18 relationships.

    The Finish-to-Finish relationship is established in 3 work days and an additional delay of 8 days. The work days correspond to the duration of the slab, and the additional delay to the concrete hardening.

    Remember that the additional delay works with a natural calendar, where all days are labor days.

Figure 2. Graph and Gantt chart for detailed mode solution

Figure 3. Graph and Gantt chart for semi-detailed mode solution

  • Schedule with sub-activities: This fourth method considers only two activities, the first for columns and slabs and the second for the hardening period, encompassing nine distinct sub-activities, each with the durations shown in Figure 4, and the graph and Gantt chart in Figure 5:

Figure 4. Graph and Gantt chart for semi-detailed mode solution

Figure 6. Graph and Gantt chart for sub-activities mode solution

For large projects, this method, utilizing sub-activities, offers the simplest and most concise scheduling approach, requiring only two activities and two relationships to encompass the entire project (Figure 6).

Figure 5. Durations for sub-activities in fourth method

Figure 1. Example graph